Unraveling the Mysteries of Lexically Mediated Compensation for Coarticulation

Published on September 15, 2023

Just like trying to catch a snowflake in midair, scientists are still struggling to fully understand lexically mediated compensation for coarticulation in speech perception. In a recent study, researchers presented data that they believed provided definitive evidence for top-down processing in speech perception. However, upon further examination, this evidence falls short of supporting their conclusion. It leaves room for alternative explanations, such as the presence of an acoustic confound in the materials used. This means that we are still searching for a clear understanding of how our brains compensate for the blending of sounds in speech processing. Interestingly, prior data from similar studies have actually challenged the notion of top-down processing in online speech recognition. The quest to unravel the mysteries of lexically mediated compensation for coarticulation continues, and it is up to future research to shed more light on this intriguing topic!

Abstract
Luthra, Peraza-Santiago, Beeson, Saltzman, Crinnion, and Magnuson (2021) present data from the lexically mediated compensation for coarticulation paradigm that they claim provides conclusive evidence in favor of top-down processing in speech perception. We argue here that this evidence does not support that conclusion. The findings are open to alternative explanations, and we give data in support of one of them (that there is an acoustic confound in the materials). Lexically mediated compensation for coarticulation thus remains elusive, while prior data from the paradigm instead challenge the idea that there is top-down processing in online speech recognition.

Read Full Article (External Site)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>