Imagine a vast field with thousands of puzzle pieces scattered across. That’s what microglia research looks like, with countless documents exploring their mysteries. But fear not! Scientists have developed a method to make sense of it all. By analyzing over 12,000 articles from 2002 to 2021, they have uncovered fascinating trends and knowledge domains within microglia research. It’s like putting together a complicated puzzle where each piece represents a different aspect of microglia biology. They discovered that the field experienced a boom after 2011, with neuroinflammation, aging, and Alzheimer’s disease being important areas of focus. They also identified key authors and institutions driving microglia research forward. However, one elusive piece remains: finding a specific marker for microglial cells. This study provides invaluable insights for researchers diving into the fascinating world of microglia. So put on your detective hat and explore this groundbreaking research!

BackgroundMicroglia have been identified for a century. In this period, their ontogeny and functions have come to light thanks to the tireless efforts of scientists. However, numerous documents are being produced, making it challenging for scholars, especially those new to the field, to understand them thoroughly. Therefore, having a reliable method for quickly grasping a field is crucial.MethodsWe searched and downloaded articles from the Web of Science Core Collection with “microglia” or “microglial” in the title from 2002 to 2021. Eventually, 12,813 articles were located and, using CiteSpace and VOSviewer, the fundamental data, knowledge domains, hot spots, and emerging trends, as well as the influential literature in the field of microglia research, were analyzed.ResultsFollowing 2011, microglia publications grew significantly. The two prominent journals are Glia and J Neuroinflamm. The United States and Germany dominated the microglia study. The primary research institutions are Harvard Univ and Univ Freiburg, and the leading authors are Prinz Marco and Kettenmann Helmut. The knowledge domains of microglia include eight directions, namely neuroinflammation, lipopolysaccharide, aging, neuropathic pain, macrophages, Alzheimer’s disease, retina, and apoptosis. Microglial phenotype is the focus of research; while RNA-seq, exosome, and glycolysis are emerging topics, a microglial-specific marker is still a hard stone. We also identified 19 influential articles that contributed to the study of microglial origin (Mildner A 2007; Ginhoux F 2010), identity (Butovsky O 2014), homeostasis (Cardona AE 2006; Elmore MRP 2014); microglial function such as surveillance (Nimmerjahn A 2005), movement (Davalos D 2005; Haynes SE 2006), phagocytosis (Simard AR 2006), and synapse pruning (Wake H 2009; Paolicelli RC 2011; Schafer DP 2012; Parkhurst CN 2013); and microglial state/phenotype associated with disease (Keren-Shaul H 2017), as well as 5 review articles represented by Kettenmann H 2011.ConclusionUsing bibliometrics, we have investigated the fundamental data, knowledge structure, and dynamic evolution of microglia research over the previous 20 years. We hope this study can provide some inspiration and a reference for researchers studying microglia in neuroscience.

Read Full Article (External Site)