Breaking the Sound Barrier: Neural Correlates of Sound Facilitation in Older Adults

Published on August 14, 2023

Imagine you’re trying to solve a puzzle, but there’s someone constantly distracting you with interesting and meaningful sounds. Surprisingly, these sounds might actually help your performance! In a recent study, researchers found that older adults who listened to task-irrelevant but meaningful sounds while performing a cognitive task showed improved performance compared to when there were no sounds. The researchers used fMRI to investigate the neural correlates of this sound facilitation effect and discovered that it activated a network of brain regions involved in auditory processing, attention, and emotion. The magnitude of the effect was also related to changes in reaction time and activation of specific brain areas like the bilateral auditory cortex and the superior parietal lobule. Interestingly, older adults with a history of falls showed even greater activation in the superior parietal lobule, suggesting that they needed to recruit more neural resources to cope with interference. These findings support the dedifferentiation hypothesis of cognitive aging, which suggests that older adults may need to compensate for age-related decline by recruiting additional brain regions. If you’re interested in learning more about how sounds can influence cognitive performance as we age, check out the full article!

IntroductionThe ability to resolve interference declines with age and is attributed to neurodegeneration and reduced cognitive function and mental alertness in older adults. Our previous study revealed that task-irrelevant but environmentally meaningful sounds improve performance on the modified Simon task in older adults. However, little is known about neural correlates of this sound facilitation effect.MethodsTwenty right-handed older adults [mean age = 72 (SD = 4), 11 female] participated in the fMRI study. They performed the modified Simon task in which the arrows were presented either in the locations matching the arrow direction (congruent trials) or in the locations mismatching the arrow direction (incongruent trials). A total of 50% of all trials were accompanied by task-irrelevant but environmentally meaningful sounds.ResultsParticipants were faster on the trials with concurrent sounds, independently of whether trials were congruent or incongruent. The sound effect was associated with activation in the distributed network of auditory, posterior parietal, frontal, and limbic brain regions. The magnitude of the behavioral facilitation effect due to sound was associated with the changes in activation of the bilateral auditory cortex, cuneal cortex, and occipital fusiform gyrus, precuneus, left superior parietal lobule (SPL) for No Sound vs. Sound trials. These changes were associated with the corresponding changes in reaction time (RT). Older adults with a recent history of falls showed greater activation in the left SPL than those without falls history.ConclusionOur findings are consistent with the dedifferentiation hypothesis of cognitive aging. The facilitatory effect of sound could be achieved through recruitment of excessive neural resources, which allows older adults to increase attention and mental alertness during task performance. Considering that the SPL is critical for integration of multisensory information, individuals with slower task responses and those with a history of falls may need to recruit this region more actively than individuals with faster responses and those without a fall history to overcome increased difficulty with interference resolution. Future studies should examine the relationship among activation in the SPL, the effect of sound, and falls history in the individuals who are at heightened risk of falls.

Read Full Article (External Site)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>