Age and balance: How the brain copes with standing

Published on May 5, 2023

Imagine you’re trying to balance on a moving subway train. Your brain is working hard to keep your body stable and prevent you from falling. Now, imagine doing the same thing when you’re older. As we age, our ability to maintain balance becomes more challenging, leading to an increased risk of falls. In this study, researchers examined how the brains of older adults respond to sensory and mechanical challenges during standing balance tests. They found that older adults had higher levels of beta cortical activity in certain areas of the brain compared to younger adults, indicating increased recruitment of neural resources to maintain balance. Interestingly, as the difficulty of the test increased, younger adults showed more beta activity while older adults showed less. This suggests that the brains of older adults may be adapting and compensating to overcome age-related declines in motor control. However, it’s important to note that reliability issues were encountered during some parts of the study, which means more research is needed to fully understand the relationship between cortical activity and postural control in aging individuals. If you’re curious about the details of this study, check out the full article!

BackgroundAge-related changes in the cortical control of standing balance may provide a modifiable mechanism underlying falls in older adults. Thus, this study examined the cortical response to sensory and mechanical perturbations in older adults while standing and examined the relationship between cortical activation and postural control.MethodsA cohort of community dwelling young (18–30 years, N = 10) and older adults (65–85 years, N = 11) performed the sensory organization test (SOT), motor control test (MCT), and adaptation test (ADT) while high-density electroencephalography (EEG) and center of pressure (COP) data were recorded in this cross-sectional study. Linear mixed models examined cohort differences for cortical activities, using relative beta power, and postural control performance, while Spearman correlations were used to investigate the relationship between relative beta power and COP indices in each test.ResultsUnder sensory manipulation, older adults demonstrated significantly higher relative beta power at all postural control-related cortical areas (p < 0.01), while under rapid mechanical perturbations, older adults demonstrated significantly higher relative beta power at central areas (p < 0.05). As task difficulty increased, young adults had increased relative beta band power while older adults demonstrated decreased relative beta power (p < 0.01). During sensory manipulation with mild mechanical perturbations, specifically in eyes open conditions, higher relative beta power at the parietal area in young adults was associated with worse postural control performance (p < 0.001). Under rapid mechanical perturbations, specifically in novel conditions, higher relative beta power at the central area in older adults was associated with longer movement latency (p < 0.05). However, poor reliability measures of cortical activity assessments were found during MCT and ADT, which limits the ability to interpret the reported results.DiscussionCortical areas are increasingly recruited to maintain upright postural control, even though cortical resources may be limited, in older adults. Considering the limitation regarding mechanical perturbation reliability, future studies should include a larger number of repeated mechanical perturbation trials.

Read Full Article (External Site)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>