MEMCONS: How Contemporaneous Note‐Taking Shapes Memory for Conversation

Published on April 18, 2023

Imagine having a magical notebook that makes your conversations crystal clear in your memory. Well, that’s almost what memcons do! Memcons are like Harry Potter’s Pensieve, capturing the essence of conversations and allowing us to reflect on them later. In this study, researchers wanted to find out how writing a memcon affects our memory of a conversation. Participants were paired up and engaged in conversation, and then asked to recall the contents of that conversation a week later. The twist? One participant in each pair wrote a memcon right after the chat. The results were fascinating: those who wrote a memcon remembered more details of the conversation than those who didn’t. However, the accuracy of the recollections remained fairly similar between the two groups. Astonishingly, only about 4.7% of the details were remembered by both participants after a week! This means that taking contemporaneous notes helps us remember more information, but not necessarily with perfect accuracy. These findings have important implications for evaluating testimonies in situations with major political or legal consequences.

Abstract
Written memoranda of conversations, or memcons, provide a near-contemporaneous record of what was said in conversation, and offer important insights into the activities of high-profile individuals. We assess the impact of writing a memcon on memory for conversation. Pairs of participants engaged in conversation and were asked to recall the contents of that conversation 1 week later. One participant in each pair memorialized the content of the interaction in a memcon shortly after the conversation. Participants who generated memcons recalled more details of the conversations than participants who did not, but the content of recall was equally and largely accurate for both participants. Remarkably, only 4.7% of the details of the conversation were recalled by both of the partners after a week delay. Contemporaneous note-taking appears to enhance memory for conversation by increasing the amount of information remembered but not the accuracy of that information. These findings have implications for evaluating the testimony of participants on conversations with major political or legal ramifications.

Read Full Article (External Site)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>