Electrode Placement in Cochlear Implant Assisted by Impedance Measurements

Published on June 23, 2022

Just like a skilled chef needs to carefully place the ingredients in a recipe to achieve a delicious dish, surgeons performing cochlear implant surgery must be precise in positioning the electrode array for optimal hearing outcomes. A study conducted using computational modeling of the cochlea has found that impedance measurements can aid in guiding the insertion of the electrode array. By analyzing impedance variations at different insertion depths and proximities to the cochlear walls, researchers discovered that changes in impedance could serve as an indicator of electrode proximity and insertion depth. This information can help surgeons avoid misplacement of the electrode array, which could cause further damage to the cochlea. The study utilized both a highly accurate but computationally intensive anatomical model, as well as a less computationally intensive geometric model that yielded comparable results. The findings show that impedance magnitude increases significantly when the electrode array is positioned very close to the cochlea wall. By observing these impedance characteristics, surgeons can identify the optimal electrode position within the scala tympani during surgery. Further experimental studies are needed to validate these results and fully harness the potential of impedance measurements in improving cochlear implant procedures.

The cochlear implantable neuromodulator provides substantial auditory perception to those with severe or profound impaired hearing. Correct electrode array positioning in the cochlea is one of the important factors for quality hearing, and misplacement may lead to additional injury to the cochlea. Visual inspection of the progress of electrode insertion is limited and mainly relies on the surgeon’s tactile skills, and there is a need to detect in real-time the electrode array position in the cochlea during insertion. The available clinical measurement presently provides very limited information. Impedance measurement may be used to assist with the insertion of the electrode array. Using computational modeling of the cochlea, and its local tissue layers merging with the associated neuromodulator electrode array parameters, the impedance variations at different insertion depths and the proximities to the cochlea walls have been analyzed. In this study, an anatomical computational model of the temporal region of a patient is used to derive the relationship between impedance variations and the electrode proximity to the cochlea wall and electrode insertion depth. The aim was to examine whether the use of electrode impedance variations can be an effective marker of electrode proximity and electrode insertion depth. The proposed anatomical model simulates the quasi-static electrode impedance variations at different selected points but at considerable computation cost. A much less computationally intensive geometric model (~1/30) provided comparative impedance measurements with differences of <2%. Both use finite element analysis over the entire cross-section area of the scala tympani. It is shown that the magnitude of the impedance varies with both electrode insertion depth and electrode proximity to the adjacent anatomical layers (e.g., cochlea wall). In particular, there is a 1,400% increase when the electrode array is moved very close to the cochlea wall. This may help the surgeon to find the optimal electrode position within the scala tympani by observation of such impedance characteristics. The misplacement of the electrode array within the scala tympani may be eliminated by using the impedance variation metric during electrode array insertion if the results are validated with an experimental study.

Read Full Article (External Site)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>