Language’s Efficiency Balancing Act with Indefinite Pronouns

Published on May 18, 2022

Language is like a well-oiled machine, constantly finding the sweet spot between simplicity and informativeness. Researchers have previously studied how human languages optimize this balance in content words like kinship terms and colors. In this work, the focus is on a different category of words: indefinite pronouns, such as ‘someone’ and ‘no one.’ By analyzing the meaning and features of indefinite pronouns across languages, the researchers find that they too strike the perfect balance between simplicity and informativeness. This supports the idea that efficient communication shapes both content and function word categories. Furthermore, these findings suggest that the trade-off can offer insights into the universal properties of indefinite pronouns, which can simplify linguistic theories. The study aligns with other research investigating the simplicity/informativeness trade-off in functional vocabulary. For those curious minds who want to dive deeper into the intricacies of language optimization, don’t miss out on exploring the underlying research!

Abstract
The vocabulary of human languages has been argued to support efficient communication by optimizing the trade-off between simplicity and informativeness. The argument has been originally based on cross-linguistic analyses of vocabulary in semantic domains of content words, such as kinship, color, and number terms. The present work applies this analysis to a category of function words: indefinite pronouns (e.g., someone, anyone, no one). We build on previous work to establish the meaning space and featural make-up for indefinite pronouns, and show that indefinite pronoun systems across languages optimize the simplicity/informativeness trade-off. This demonstrates that pressures for efficient communication shape both content and function word categories. In doing so, our work aligns with several concurrent studies exploring the simplicity/informativeness trade-off in functional vocabulary. Importantly, we further argue that the trade-off may explain some of the universal properties of indefinite pronouns, thus reducing the explanatory load for linguistic theories.

Read Full Article (External Site)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>