Imagine you have a superpower where every letter or number you see automatically triggers a burst of color! That’s what it’s like for people with grapheme-color synesthesia. In this study, scientists wanted to see if the synesthetes’ colorful perception of letters and numbers affected their ability to recognize faces. Using tests like the Cambridge Face Memory Test (CFMT) and the Vanderbilt Holistic Face Processing Task (VHPT-F), they compared the face-recognition skills of 16 synesthetes to a control group of non-synesthetes. The results showed that synesthetes had a harder time recognizing faces and were particularly challenged when the faces were upright in the CFMT. However, they still demonstrated a similar advantage in holistic processing compared to the non-synesthetes. Interestingly, the synesthetes themselves reported being worse at recognizing faces. This suggests that experiencing colors with graphemes may impact how synesthetes develop their own unique ways of perceiving faces.
Abstract
Grapheme-color synesthesia is a heterogeneous neurological phenomenon whereby the experience of a grapheme automatically and involuntarily elicits an experience of color. While the majority of synesthesia research has focused on inducer-specific influences of synesthetic associations, more recent efforts have examined potential broader differences. Based on spontaneous reports from synesthetes detailing problems with face recognition, in conjunction with the geographical proximity of neurological regions relevant to both synesthesia and face processing, we sought to examine whether synesthetes demonstrated atypical face-processing abilities.
A total of 16 grapheme-color synesthetes and 16 age-and-gender matched controls (±3 years) completed the Cambridge Face Memory Test (CFMT; Duchaine & Nakayama, 2006) of face memory, the Vanderbilt Holistic Face Processing Task (VHPT-F; Richler, Floyd, & Gauthier, 2014) of holistic face processing, as well as a standardized self-report questionnaire the Faces and Emotions Questionnaire (Freeman, Palermo, & Brock, 2015). The results revealed significantly poorer performance in synesthete’s ability to recognize faces in the CFMT that was driven by a reduction in upright advantage. Results also revealed a significant reduction in overall accuracy on the VHPT-F for synesthetes, who despite this displayed a comparable holistic processing advantage compared to matched controls. Finally, synesthetes also rated themselves as significantly worse at face recognition. We suggest that this pattern may reflect differences in the development of individualized perceptual strategies.
Dr. David Lowemann, M.Sc, Ph.D., is a co-founder of the Institute for the Future of Human Potential, where he leads the charge in pioneering Self-Enhancement Science for the Success of Society. With a keen interest in exploring the untapped potential of the human mind, Dr. Lowemann has dedicated his career to pushing the boundaries of human capabilities and understanding.
Armed with a Master of Science degree and a Ph.D. in his field, Dr. Lowemann has consistently been at the forefront of research and innovation, delving into ways to optimize human performance, cognition, and overall well-being. His work at the Institute revolves around a profound commitment to harnessing cutting-edge science and technology to help individuals lead more fulfilling and intelligent lives.
Dr. Lowemann’s influence extends to the educational platform BetterSmarter.me, where he shares his insights, findings, and personal development strategies with a broader audience. His ongoing mission is shaping the way we perceive and leverage the vast capacities of the human mind, offering invaluable contributions to society’s overall success and collective well-being.