Understanding the complexities of copredication statements is like solving a mind-boggling puzzle. In these statements, a single phrase describes two different entities at once, which puzzles truth-conditional semantics. To unravel this mystery, researchers have delved into two intriguing questions: What mechanisms shape our judgments about whether copredication statements make sense? And why do similar statements varying in their degree of sensibility? They propose a sophisticated model within the predictive processing framework that sheds light on both questions. This cognitive-computational model explores how word representations and cognitive processes influence our perception of copredication validity. Additionally, it explains the variations in degrees of sensibility by considering expectations based on higher-order priors and their link to discourse context and world knowledge. By aligning linguistic intuitions with cognitive mechanisms, this research broadens our understanding of copredication in language. For an in-depth exploration and thrilling conclusions, dive into the full article!
Abstract
We propose a cognitive-psychological model of linguistic intuitions about copredication statements. In copredication statements, like “The book is heavy and informative,” the nominal denotes two ontologically distinct entities at the same time. This has been considered a problem for standard truth-conditional semantics. In this paper, we discuss two questions that have so far received less attention: What kinds of word representations and cognitive mechanisms are responsible for judgments about the felicitousness of copredication statements? Relatedly, why can similar copredication statements have different degrees of felicitousness? We first propose a cognitive-computational model of copredication within the predictive processing framework. We then suggest that certain asymmetries in felicitousness judgments can be modeled in terms of a set of expectations that are influenced by higher-order priors associated with discourse context and world knowledge.
Dr. David Lowemann, M.Sc, Ph.D., is a co-founder of the Institute for the Future of Human Potential, where he leads the charge in pioneering Self-Enhancement Science for the Success of Society. With a keen interest in exploring the untapped potential of the human mind, Dr. Lowemann has dedicated his career to pushing the boundaries of human capabilities and understanding.
Armed with a Master of Science degree and a Ph.D. in his field, Dr. Lowemann has consistently been at the forefront of research and innovation, delving into ways to optimize human performance, cognition, and overall well-being. His work at the Institute revolves around a profound commitment to harnessing cutting-edge science and technology to help individuals lead more fulfilling and intelligent lives.
Dr. Lowemann’s influence extends to the educational platform BetterSmarter.me, where he shares his insights, findings, and personal development strategies with a broader audience. His ongoing mission is shaping the way we perceive and leverage the vast capacities of the human mind, offering invaluable contributions to society’s overall success and collective well-being.